Subject: Re[6]: TCPIP/FTP Router
and PORT numbers
Author: Ron Herardian at GSS
Date: 02-13-96 12:46
Kazu,
Please find my comments below in blue
flagged with a dash ("-").
Ron
--
Subject: Re[5]: TCPIP/FTP Router
and PORT numbers
Author: "cc:Mail Interest Group" <CCMAIL-L@listserv.okstate.edu>
at INTERNET
Date: 2/12/96 9:34 AM
Ron,
1. We are looking for a capability of having multiple listening sessions
on one router machine (OS/2). I thought that we had to wait for 5.14
(?) or maybe R6. It sounds that Router 5.13 allows multiple listening
sessions already. Is this true?
- It is true. This capability is available
in version 5.13.02. I am testing with FTP Software's PC/TCP for OS/2
version 1.31.
2. How many incoming sessions over TCP/IP do you think one OS/2 router
can handle? Say, with a Pendium 75Mhz machine over 10Mbit Ethernet.
- I have a customer running 8 sessions
per machine with up to 3 concurrent users. In my testing I am using
3 sessions on a Pentium 90 with Warp (only 16MB RAM at this time).
3. We are also looking for a possiblity of automatic router machine
huting (IP huting) so that we can have many listening sessions with
multiple router machines. This capability is also desiarable from
a reliablity point of view so that we can have redundant router configuration
in which earch router machine backs up each other automatically.
- I am doing this now for Mobile users.
In this case, it's actually very simple. Just enter the node names
or IP addresses of multiple Routers in the Mobile Address Book address
field for the user's home post office. Mobile automatically rolls
over to the next Router when a connection fails.
A regular dial-up or X.25 network has such hunt group capability in
the network itself. Since the TCP/IP network does not have any concept
of hunt group for IP addresses, something has to be done outside of
the network. Do you have any idea for this? One thing cc:Mail could
do is to implement a multiple addressing capability just like cc:Mobile
has. But unfortunatly, cc:Mail does not have multiple addressing now.
Kazu.
-You would have to use a front-end processor
of some kind to get one IP node name to resolve to multiple IP addresses
via DNS based on the availability of the destination host (a free
cc:Mail Router session). One customer of mine has a system like this
to front end TN3270 sessions. Maybe the same vendor can solve your
problem as well. I'll see if I can get the vendor information for
you.
Ron
--
Subject: Re[4]: TCPIP/FTP Router and PORT numbers
Author: "cc:Mail Interest Group" <CCMAIL-L@listserv.okstate.edu>
at INTERNET
Date: 2/11/96 9:37 PM
Perry,
The latest version of Router (5.13.02) is still written with FTP Software's
API. In the future, we'll have Router running natively on NT and also
more products that use Winsock. In the mean time, we're stuck with
FTP Software. I've had few problems with FTP's TCP/IP stack, although
the configuration can be trying.
Subject: Re: Re[2]: TCPIP/FTP
Router and PORT numbers
Author: "cc:Mail Interest Group" <CCMAIL-L@listserv.okstate.edu>
at
INTERNET_ROUTER
Date: 2/11/96 1:18 PM
Ron,
Do you have to use FTP's TCP/IP stack, or can you use the stack that
came with Warp Connect? I am interested in doing this not over the
internet, but through a central Shiva box with IP support to local
cc:Mail routers.
Thanks,
-Perry Harris
On Fri, 9 Feb 1996 17:47:01 -0600 you wrote:
FYI - You can also run multiple sessions under OS/2 with Router 5.13.02.
I am testing this under Warp with concurrent inbound connections from
Mobile users.
If this works well enough, I can have large numbers of Mobile users
get their mail via Internet. This will be very good for traveling
business people because they can dial a local number for Internet
access, rather than a long-distance call to a cc:Mail Router.
Ron
--